Mad Men is one of the most hyped, critically-acclaimed shows of the decade. It has won two Emmys for Outstanding Drama Series, and has had numerous other wins and nominations. John Hamm is widely respected for his role as Don Draper, and the rest of the cast is praised along with him. The question remains, is the series really all that people say it is?
For the most part, the answer is yes. Let's start with the thing this show does right every time: namely, the casting. Even actors I had a negative disposition towards (ie Mark Moses [Desperate Housewives], Vincent Kartheiser [Angel]) prove admirable and, in both aforementioned cases, are some of the best parts of the ensemble. However, it is difficult to point to a clear strong area in the cast, as each and every one of them is pitch perfect in their respective roles. My personal favorite on the male side is John Slattery, a man who deserved a break after being killed off one show and having another cancelled. Wisely underused by the producers, he provides some necessary comic relief.
While the show is called "Mad Men," the women are the real scene stealers. Elisabeth Moss (in her Emmy-nominated part) is excellent, as are the endless parade of female guest stars. Alison Brie, playing opposite Kartheiser, really gets to shine in a few episodes, proving to be a truly under-rated star. Even Christina Hendricks, an actress who brought much-needed light to the premiere season, ups her game to the point of being award-worthy. But the MVP has to go to January Jones' Betty Draper. She is deliciously hollow and mournful, matching Hamm point for point. A show without her (or really any of the women), would destroy the very core of the program.
All the little nit-picks I had about the previous season disappeared in the premiere of this one. The boring flash-backs were (mostly) gone, the fat Peggy was fat no more, and the episodes didn't end in loose end format. The latter is most important, as this was a major bother in the first season. For instance, what happened to the "Joan's roommate being in love with her" story? Nothing. Intriguing, but gone in a flash. I'm not sure if this was bad writing or a floppy attempt at realism, but it was annoying either way.
The writing for this season seems more cohesive and the guest spots seem thought out. Colin Hanks (son of Tom) wonderfully plays a priest in three episodes, while a steamy Sam Page (Point Pleasant) is cast as Joan's sleazy fiance. They both feel natural and interesting, bringing a little mystery and (in Page's case) horror to the show. Page and Hendricks have one of the most affecting scenes in the show's history, and they carry it out marvelously.
As for the quality of the sound and picture, it is difficult to find fault with either one. The crisp, clean shots of the 60's lifestyle are presented in near-hi-def quality, whether with interior or exterior scenes. The workplace set is creatively built, and it has a "if Wisteria-Lane were an office building" type of feel to it. That is to say, you feel the smooth transition from room to room, and it gives the impression of an actual environment.
If I had one complaint about this show, it would have to be the watchability factor. If you want marathon viewing, pick up a season of 24 or How I Met Your Mother because it is difficult to watch more than an episode at a time with this one. It's not the show's fault, but the distinct flavor and attitude of it is so dark, you have to give yourself a break between credits. But if you are patient, this unique and incredible drama will envelope you like the cigarette smoke that fills the rooms of Sterling Cooper. Highly recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment